The lack of agricultural insurance in Mexico

The last weekend I visited Buenos Aires Ejido near to Ameca, my hometown in Jalisco, México. I wanted to take a look over the beautiful corn fields that I had seen previously. However, the situation was sad; the ejido was hit by a frozen storm that changed suddenly the yield expectations. Three weeks ago the expectations reached 10 tons per hectare in average (almost the yield obtained in U.S.), but after the storm the expectations were reducing by half. Weather conditions is one kind of risk that corn peasants face continually; drought, floods, biological diseases, and volatile input prices are also production risks that corn peasants face during summer cycle, the most planted in Mexico.

The problem to corn peasants is that they face large fixed costs; the quantity of inputs is more related to the area planted than the yield. The costs in the surface damaged by the storm will be the same than the area not affected; however, in the last the income will be twice as low as the affected even though the inputs employed in both cases were the same. To see the differences, in 2007 the production cost estimated by a state financial agency called FIRA was $10,824 per hectare in Jalisco and the farmer corn price was of $2,500 per ton; considering this information we see in average the net income in the region of Ciudad Guzman was of $186 (a ratio income/costs of 2%), and the net income in La Barca was of $7,126 (a ration income/costs of 66%), very different results not seen typically in the most of economic activities.

These eventualities are part of the agricultural cycles, making highly risky be peasant. In the period of 1996-2006 the difference between the maximum yield and the minimum yield in Jalisco was 2.9 tons (Minimum in 1997=2.25; 2005=4.54); 2.12 in Guanajuato (Minimum in 1997 =3.27; Maximun in 2004= 5.39); and 1.71 in Nayarit (Minimum in 2005=2.17; 2002=3.88). These kinds of changes are not observed in other economic activities; imagine aggregate manufacture production in any region suddenly fall 50% year to year; in fact during the 1994-95 recession in Mexico the manufacturing production index fall, from its peak 108 (November 1994) to its lowest point of 92 (April 1995), a decline of 15%, the worst fall in the last two decades; a typical negative rate in any cycle and any area of corn production in Mexico.

Considering these eventualities, insurance mechanisms provided by governmental and private organizations are the usual solution; and in other countries, the operation of future markets or access to one of them is a solution pursued by producers and governments. However in Mexico the producers don’t have access to this kind of financial tools to minimize the risks. ASERCA (www.aserca.gob.mx) have attempted modulate the price risks faced by producers through indirect price coverage; however the production risk is not adequately tamed or covered, this is the main risk and the direct subsidies have not been the solution. Given the importance of agricultural in the political debate and in fighting against the poverty in Mexico, find a market solution must be considered as way to improve the production conditions as way to mitigate poverty in Mexico, elevate food supply, and reduce the income volatility of our farmers.